Harvard Classics vs. Great Books of the Western World

Comments Off

Posted on 27th June 2009 by Jamie in Harvard |Mortimer Adler |Reading |Robert Hutchins |The Great Books |books |great books |lifelong learning |self education

harvard-vs-great-booksThere are two book collections designed to give the average reader an in-depth liberal education: the Harvard Classics and the Great Books of the Western World.

The volumes in the Great Books (1952) and the Harvard Classics (1909) collections were hand-picked by influential presidents of major universities. During a time when college was strictly for the elite, these collections served as a way to make Western culture and learning available to anyone. Thousands of Americans gave themselves a self-education by working their way through these historic books.

In previous posts, I’ve discussed the benefits of reading great books. Here, I’m going to walk you through the basics of these two major collections and help you decide which is right for you. You can give yourself a classical education without relying on a pre-set reading list. However, when you’re just getting started, it helps to have a bit of guidance.

(Before I get to the good stuff, it’s important to note two issues with these book collections. First, like any book list, these are flawed and will leave out some of the most important works. Second, these were commercial productions published with the intention of generating revenue. Although all of the individual works are now available for free in the public domain, the commercial nature of the collections likely had some influence on book selection).

Harvard Classics

“Before the reading plan represented by the Harvard Classics had taken definite form, I had more than once stated in public that in my opinion a five-foot—at first a three-foot—shelf would hold books enough to afford a good substitute for a liberal education to anyone who would read them with devotion, even if he could spare but fifteen minutes a day for reading.” – Charles Eliot

The 51 volumes for the Harvard Classics collection were selected by Harvard President Charles W. Eliot in 1909. The set is often referred to as the “five foot shelf of books,” a tribute to Eliot’s widely-publicized claim that anyone could gain a liberal education by reading a set of books that take up no more than five feet. The Harvard Classics include a variety of full works from the Western tradition including essays, poems, novels, scientific papers, and more.

Most volumes contain writings from several authors, each with a brief introductory note. A final book offers lectures on the classics based on historic period and genre. Although the Harvard Classics are no longer in print, used collections are easily locatable online and in thrift stores.

Pros: wide variety of Western works, many authors included

Cons: unusual non-chronological organization, no modern works

Great Books of the Western World

“This is more than a set of books, and more than a liberal education. Great Books of the Western World is an act of piety. Here are the sources of our being. Here is our heritage. This is the West. This is its meaning for mankind.” -Robert Hutchins

Forty-three years after the Harvard Classics were introduced, a new collection was born under the guidance of University of Chicago President Robert Hutchins. The Great Books of the Western World originally offered 54 volumes of chronologically-organized classics.

The majority of volumes in the Great Books set include writings from just one author. The works selected are similar in genre to those in the Harvard Classics. Additionally, the Great Books set includes an introductory volume, “The Great Conversation,” and two in-depth indexes tracing ideas between all of the works in the collection.

In 1990, the collection was updated with some edits and the inclusion of six additional books featuring modern writers. The new set is still published by Encyclopedia Britannica; the older collection is regularly sold at a discount on eBay.

Pros: chronological organization, updated content, useful index

Cons: harder to find no-cost versions online, fewer authors in relation to pages

[table id=3 /]

What Will You Read?

Personally, I’ve chosen to work my way through the Great Books of the Western World because I want to see how the pieces build on each other over time (plus, I got a great deal online). I know others who prefer the Harvard Classics because of the variety offered in most volumes.

Which do you prefer? Neither collection is clearly better than the other. But, hopefully, knowing the differences between the Great Books and the Harvard Classics will help you make an informed decision.

Practical Learning: Reuniting Thinking and Doing

Comments Off

Posted on 24th June 2009 by Jamie in Basics Of Self Education |Learning Tips |learning |lifelong learning |self education |skill development

hand-holding-wrench-stock-expert“If thinking is bound up with action, then the task of getting an adequate grasp on the world, intellectually, depends on our doing stuff in it.”

The word “intelligence” conjures up images of books, classrooms, and serious-minded professors. But, real learning is just as likely to involve wrenches, ballet studios, and repairmen examining the parts of a bicycle.

In Shop Class as Soulcraft: an Inquiry into the Value of Work, Matthew Crawford shares his experiences and research related to the divide between thinking and doing. In this post, I’ll summarize some of his ideas and discuss their implications for independent learners. You don’t have to choose between being a “thinker” or a “do-er.” By accepting both, may find that your work is more intellectually rewarding than ever.

Are You Living an Abstract Life?

Many people now graduate from high school or even college without the ability to do anything. They get jobs as knowledge workers and their work consists of creating ideas, brands, and culture. Or, they work in a cubicle with such little responsibility that they do not need to know how to actually create anything on their own.

At home, people live apart from the things that they own. We don’t know how things work and we don’t know how to fix them. We have little connection to what we drive, wear, eat, and live in. In fact, manufacturers are beginning to create products that are harder to fix. Many cars, for example, now require foreign, specialized tools that can only be purchased by a dealer.

Unfortunately, living so abstractly makes us disconnected from the world.

Thinking and doing are meant to be united. A true intellectual is able to apply his learning to the actual world, instead of simply living in clouds of ideas and theories. The type of knowledge that results in action can’t be taught in classrooms alone. It requires people to create and to fix, to learn through practice and failure.

After graduating with a PhD in philosophy and getting a job at a highly-regarded think tank, author Matthew Crawford became frustrated with the fact that his work was so abstract. He wanted to do something. So, he quit the think tank and opened up a motorcycle repair shop. It may sound unusual for such an educated person to choose manual labor. But, Crawford found that working on a trade was, in fact, more intellectually stimulating.

Practical knowledge isn’t as easily transferred as facts and statistics. But, its results are real and tangible. “Practical know-how…is always tied to the experience of a particular person,” writes Crawford. “It can’t be downloaded, it can only be lived.”

How Thinking was Separated from Doing

Originally, work wasn’t so disconnected from practical knowledge. People employed at banks, car manufacturers, or other jobs were encouraged to use their minds when making work-related decisions.

Then, the idea of “scientific management” became popular. Basically, this line of thought states that the best way to get work done is to give people small, highly-structured tasks that they do not need to really think about. Crawford explains:

“The dichotomy of mental versus manual didn’t arise spontaneously. Rather, the twentieth century saw concerted efforts to separate thinking from doing. Those efforts achieved a good deal of success in ordering our economic life, and it is this success that perhaps explains the plausibility the distinction now enjoys. Yet, to call this ‘success’ is deeply perverse, for wherever the separation of thinking from doing has been achieved, it has been responsible for the degradation of work.”

Instead of building a complete car, an employee now took on the job of applying hub cap after hub cap in an assembly line. Instead of analyzing the facts to determine if a loan applicant is creditworthy, the banker simply entered information into a computer. In many cases, doing things in the workplace became fragmented and lost its intellectual quality.

The best way of illustrating the separation of thinking and doing, is to see exactly what business expert Fredrick Winslow Taylor was telling people about company management:

“The managers assume…the burden of gathering together all of the traditional knowledge which in the past has been possessed by the workmen and then of classifying, tabulating, and reducing this knowledge into rules, laws, and formulae…

All possible brain work should be removed from the workshop and centered in the planning or laying-out department…”

Remove “all possible brain work” from employment? Yikes. No wonder so many people find their jobs unfulfilling. They’re discouraged from intelligent work and prodded into simply following rules and procedures.

What Can You Do?

One of the most important steps lifelong learners can take is eliminating their prejudice about manual work. Realize that thinking-jobs are no better than doing-jobs. In fact, in many cases doing-jobs require more intellectual stamina.

Crawford urges readers to stop being afraid of learning how to do things well:

“The egalitarian worry that has always attended tracking students into ‘college prep’ and ‘vocational ed’ is overlaid with another: the fear that acquiring a specific skill set means that one’s life is determined. In college, by contrast, many students don’t learn anything of particular application; college is the ticket to an open future. Craftsmanship entails learning one thing really well, while the ideal of the new economy is to be able to learn new things, celebrating potential rather than achievement.”

Even if you want to work in academia and prefer the abstract, consider learning how to do something in your spare time. You may find a certain satisfaction in creating and repairing things that are real.

Another way to reconnect thinking and doing is to pay more attention to the things you interact with on a day-to-day basis. Can you mend your clothes? Stop a leaking faucet? Grow your own food? You could pay someone to do these tasks, but choosing to be a master of your things is a step towards intellectual freedom.

Embrace practical knowledge and you’ll begin to bridge the artificial separation between thinking and doing.

See Also:

The Joy of Practical Learning

The 3 Forms of Learning and Why You Won’t Want to Ignore Any of Them

5 Ways You Can Support Self-Education on the Web

Comments Off

Posted on 17th June 2009 by Jamie in Learning Resources |Learning Tips |lifelong learning |self education |volunteerism

The web is an amazing collection of no-cost resources for lifelong learners. I’ve shared hundreds of resource links on this blog and there are millions of others available to help anyone in their pursuit of learning. I often take learning-oriented websites for granted. But, every once and a while, it’s important to consider how these [...]